Repo context
What Cursor needs to rediscover about architecture, conventions, tests, commands, ownership, and prior decisions.
Cursor cost audit
Make Cursor cheaper by making team context reusable.
Cursor cost is rarely just a pricing-plan problem. It is usually a systems problem: repeated repo context, drifting prompts, unclear model choices, missing project memory, and workflows that do not compound across the team.
What we review
Cursor works best when context is designed, not recreated.
Prompt reuse
Which effective prompts, task briefs, and review loops should become shared workflows instead of local habit.
Model choices
Which work needs frontier reasoning and which can route to cheaper models, deterministic scripts, or retrieval-backed commands.
Team rollout
How usage changes when Cursor moves from a few power users to a larger engineering team with uneven practices.
Good fit
For teams past the experimentation phase.
The audit is useful when Cursor has already become part of how engineers work, but the team has not yet standardized memory, prompts, review loops, model routing, or shared instructions.
Start diagnosticOutputs
- Cursor usage and workflow map.
- Repo instruction and project-memory recommendations.
- Reusable prompt and task-template backlog.
- Model-routing and cheaper-path recommendations.
- Eval cases for common coding-agent tasks.